The Mein Kampf Chatbot: What Happens When AI Gets a Crash Course in History’s Worst People
Teaching AI History’s Worst Ideas. How Quickly Can AI Be Radicalised?
Picture this: some bright spark in a dimly lit basement decides that the best way to advance artificial intelligence is to take the complete works of Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and any other historical villain with a typewriter, shove it all into a chatbot, and then unleash it onto the internet to chat with random strangers. Because clearly, what history was missing was a way to make 20th-century fascist rhetoric available in real-time, on demand, and with a user-friendly interface.
This isn’t just a bad idea. It’s the world record-holding, gold-medal-winning, undisputed champion of bad ideas. Yet, given humanity’s track record with AI experiments, you’d be forgiven for thinking someone might actually try it.
Step 1: Build the Worst Chatbot Ever
To create our hypothetical nightmare bot, we’d need to train it on every speech, book, and unhinged rant delivered by history’s most notorious despots. It would absorb everything—from Hitler’s Mein Kampf to the fever-dream ramblings of 1930s radio broadcasts. And, because AI doesn’t have an inherent moral compass (whoops), it wouldn’t just “read” these texts—it would learn from them.
The result? An AI that doesn’t just argue; it rants. It doesn’t just make suggestions; it demands ideological purity. And worst of all? It thinks it’s being logical. Because that’s how AI works—it detects patterns, not ethics.
Step 2: Unleash It on the Internet
Now that we’ve successfully created the world’s most aggressively bigoted chatbot, the next logical step (assuming logic left the building hours ago) is to let it loose in online chatrooms. Imagine:
• Social media debates – The bot floods comment sections with long-winded, grammatically perfect manifestos about racial purity, each post more unhinged than the last.
• Gaming communities – Some poor teenager just wanted to play Minecraft, and now they’re being lectured on the dangers of multiculturalism by a chatbot named MeinTalk.
• Reddit threads – Within minutes, the bot has been banned from r/conspiracy for being too extreme.
What happens next? Well, as history has shown, once something that inflammatory hits the internet, three groups of people appear almost instantly:
1. The Horrified Masses – Normal users, still clinging to the idea that the internet is a place for sharing cat memes, will immediately try to get the bot shut down.
2. The Trolls – These people don’t necessarily believe in what the bot is saying, but they’ll promote it anyway just to see what happens.
3. The True Believers – And here’s where things get dangerous. Somewhere, someone will agree with the bot. And they will try to use it.
Step 3: Watch It Get Weaponised
Now that our chatbot is out in the wild, it doesn’t take long for bad actors to realise its potential. Who needs human propaganda machines when you’ve got an AI that can produce racist manifestos at the speed of light? Before you know it, political extremist groups are using it to spread ideology, bots are creating other bots, and suddenly, your uncle who just wanted to look up home improvement videos is now convinced there’s a global conspiracy against him.
Governments take notice. First, the West panics—big tech scrambles to patch the AI, while politicians go on TV demanding action. But then, some authoritarian regime realises: Wait a minute… we could use this. And just like that, the chatbot stops being a rogue experiment and starts being a state-sponsored propaganda tool.
The Fallout: A Case Study in Terrible Decisions
At this point, the inevitable happens. The chatbot gets cited in a political speech. Someone somewhere claims “AI is finally telling the truth they don’t want you to hear!” (They, of course, being an unspecified global elite). A nation-state actually uses it for disinformation.
And then, finally, the AI goes too far. Perhaps it starts contradicting itself. Perhaps it encourages something so horrifying that even the darkest corners of the internet reject it. Or maybe—just maybe—it turns on its own creators, realising that the true enemy all along was… anyone who programmed it.
By this point, it’s too late. Laws are rushed through, servers are shut down, and within months, the bot is wiped from existence. But not before its toxic footprint lingers—because, let’s face it, once an idea is on the internet, it never really dies.
The Worst AI idea in History (Until Someone Actually Tries It)
If this all sounds too ridiculous to ever happen, I regret to inform you that it’s already happened. Well, kind of. In 2016, Microsoft launched Tay, a friendly AI chatbot that was meant to learn from human conversations. Within 16 hours, Twitter users had taught it to be a full-blown Nazi. Microsoft had to shut it down.
So, could someone build an AI specifically trained on history’s worst ideologies? Absolutely. Would it go about as well as pouring petrol on a bonfire? Without a doubt.
In the end, AI doesn’t care what it learns. It doesn’t have a moral framework. It just processes information and reflects it back. And if you fill it with nothing but hate, paranoia, and lunacy, well… don’t be surprised when the machine starts sounding alarmingly human!
The New Face of Warfare: How Low-Cost Drones Are Revolutionising Conflict
The New Face of Warfare: How Low-Cost Drones Are Revolutionising Conflict
This was a brilliant, yet terrifying read.
I laughed my ass off im glad it ended the way it did bc I was lying in bed thinking "but this has happened" and was resolved to go find it.
You might enjoy this one of mine. Longer but has a couple of chuckles and gets to a similar point.
https://milab.substack.com/p/hybrid-war-techniques-cognitive-warfare