The Great Tech Taming: China Gagged Its Unicorns—Maybe the West Should’ve Taken Notes

While the world mocked Beijing’s tech crackdown, Washington’s digital darlings now look like they’re auditioning for “Dancing with the Autocrats.”

Turns out, a government seizing control of its tech titans might be less dystopian than watching them fold like paper cranes under political pressure.

When China Put the Leash on its Tech Bros.

Remember when Beijing told Jack Ma to sit down and shut up? We all clutched our pearls. How dare they muzzle innovation, we cried, while tweeting from iPhones made in Foxconn factories with six-day workweeks and nets under the windows. China’s approach in 2020–2021? Brutal, yes. Unethical? Possibly. Effective? Painfully so.

The Ant Group IPO was killed faster than a bad karaoke performance in North Korea. Alibaba got smacked with a record $2.8 billion fine. Tencent was forced to swear off monopolistic behaviour like a teenager promising to be “more responsible” next time they crash the family car. And then came the pièce de résistance: the golden shares—government-appointed board seats in private companies. Like if the IRS asked for a seat next to Zuck at the Meta shareholder meeting.

We laughed. We called it authoritarian overreach. But now?

Well, the West’s tech sector has gone from “free market disruptors” to “please-don’t-tweet-that-Mr-President” in record time.

Meanwhile, in the Land of the Free (To Do as You’re Told)…

It’s 2025. Trump’s back, and Big Tech looks like it’s been caught in the headlights of a reality-TV-meets-banana-republic juggernaut. Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta—companies that once styled themselves as nation-states with nap pods—are now being whipped into political compliance like it’s part of the deal.

Want to moderate content? Careful. That might “interfere with free speech.”

Don’t moderate content? Oops, now you’re aiding insurrection.

Need chip supplies from Taiwan? Not so fast, there’s a new tariff war on Thursdays.

And don’t even get us started on X (formerly known as Twitter, currently known as “Elon’s Brain on WiFi”).

The once-mighty tech titans are finding out what it’s like to operate under a regime that doesn’t do nuance, especially when that regime happens to be their home address.

So Was China Right All Along?

Let’s be clear: no one’s saying Beijing is a model of virtue. Their approach to tech regulation was less “committee discussion” and more “decapitation strike.” But—and it’s a big, awkward, wriggling ‘but’—they achieved something the West never dared: they reminded their tech giants that they are not, in fact, above the state.

In the U.S., the reverse happened. Big Tech grew so fast, so vast, and so omnipresent that the government is now reliant on it. The CIA might as well subcontract surveillance to Amazon at this point (if they haven’t already), and Google practically is the Department of Education for half the planet.

So when these companies come under pressure from a volatile administration—say, one that believes elections are optional and tariffs are foreplay—the entire world gets dragged into the drama.

Why It Matters? (A Lot More Than You Think)!

This isn’t just about techies in Silicon Valley losing sleep over political optics. It’s about:

• Governments using American infrastructure: for defence, energy, education, and healthcare… while those platforms nervously appease Trump’s Twitter tantrums.

• Small businesses everywhere: relying on U.S. platforms like AWS, Shopify, and Meta… which might soon be subjected to policy pivots based on who last insulted the Commander-in-Chief.

• You and me: giving up data on everything from location to menstrual cycles… to companies now terrified of disobeying political directives that come wrapped in “executive orders” and sprinkled with the subtlety of a hand grenade.

If you read my earlier article, World, We Have a Problem, you’ll already be twitching at the idea that practically every part of global society—commerce, communication, entertainment, public services—is running on U.S. tech. If you haven’t read it yet, do yourself a favour. It pairs nicely with this piece, like red wine and existential dread.

The Lesser of Two Evils?

In one corner: China, locking down its tech firms with authoritarian micromanagement.

In the other: The U.S., where tech companies must now decide if they want to be on the good side of a man who once asked if bleach could cure COVID.

Pick your poison.

But if you’re a foreign government or an average citizen hoping to live outside the blast radius, here’s the catch: you don’t get to pick. You’re already hooked into systems, software, and services owned by companies that report to one of those corners. And if they’re being coerced, you’re the one who’ll pay the price—whether in data, dollars, or digital freedom.

What Can Be Done?

For Governments:

• Start building national alternatives. Yes, it’s expensive. Yes, you’ll probably suck at it for the first five years. Do it anyway.

• Decentralise critical infrastructure. Relying on U.S.-based clouds for defence systems is like locking your front door and giving the key to a drunken housemate.

• Collaborate with like-minded nations to build tech coalitions. It’s 2025, not 1995—tech sovereignty is now as vital as food security.

For Citizens:

• Minimise your data footprint. If an app wants your face, location, fingerprints, and DNA for a cookie recipe, maybe just write it down instead.

• Diversify your platforms. Try non-U.S. alternatives. Yes, some are clunky. But freedom is rarely convenient.

• Use encryption and privacy-first tools like Signal, ProtonMail, and Brave. It’s not being paranoid if they actually are watching you.

Final Thoughts: Xi Knew What Time It Was.

Turns out, when Xi Jinping smacked down his tech giants, he wasn’t just flexing muscle—he was future-proofing the state. America, meanwhile, handed its critical infrastructure to frat-boy billionaires, then acted surprised when they caved under pressure.

We mocked China’s approach because it felt anti-innovation. But letting unaccountable megafirms run your country via API calls? That’s not innovation. That’s surrender with better UX.

And in the age of Trump 2.0, it’s a surrender the whole world might come to regret.

Thank you for reading! This concludes my three-part exploration of the technology sector and its impact on our everyday lives. If you missed the previous articles, simply head over to the main Truth Decay page to find the other two, along with all of my other writings. If you enjoyed this article, I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a moment to hit the share button. And if you’d like to see more content like this, please take just a couple of seconds to subscribe below!

If you’re interested in supporting the work I do, donations on Ko-fi can be as little as the price of a coffee, and for those looking to provide long-term support, there are annual subscriptions available through the Substack subscription page. Every contribution, no matter how small, is greatly appreciated! Otherwise, I’ll still love a Sub & Share which costs absolutely nothing.