Ceasefire, Reload, Repeat: The Tragic Farce of Gaza's ‘Peace’ Deals.

How Israel’s Ceasefires Have Become Intermissions Before Even Deadlier Acts — and Why History Suggests We Shouldn’t Expect a Different Ending in 2025.

Jun 06, 2025

Ceasefire? More Like a Smoke Break Before the Next Massacre (Because that’s how the past ones have turned out).

“Everyone keeps talking about a ceasefire as if it’s a reset button — but history tells us it’s more like an intermission before the second act of annihilation.”

‘Ceasefire’ — that quaint old diplomatic fantasy where we all pretend that if we just pause the bloodshed long enough, everyone will suddenly find their conscience, apologies for the mass graves, and pop down to Geneva for tea and reconciliation. It’s adorable, really. Except in Gaza, where a "ceasefire" is increasingly code for "let Israel reload."

On 5 June 2025, the United States once again did what it does best at the UN Security Council: stood alone in a corner, proudly vetoing a resolution that would’ve — shock horror — called for a permanent ceasefire and halted the ongoing slaughter of more civilians in Gaza.

Fourteen out of fifteen Council members backed the motion. The U.S. did not. Because of course it didn’t. Reuters

The reason? The resolution didn’t sufficiently condemn Hamas or demand their disarmament. Because naturally, the best time to negotiate the military decommissioning of a non-state militia is while it's being flattened by drone strikes and buried under rubble.

“The U.S. has vetoed Israel-related accountability resolutions more times than you’ve likely had hot dinners this month — at least 34, and counting.”

This isn’t some one-off moral lapse. It’s a pattern. The U.S. has now vetoed six ceasefire resolutions since October 2023, all while Gaza has become a mass grave with WiFi.
Over the past several decades, the tally of U.S. vetoes protecting Israel stands at 34 — U.S. vetoes, they are now so reliably frequent you can set your watch by them. Al Jazeera.

Even China — not exactly known for its humanitarian legacy — called out the U.S. for dragging global diplomacy to “an all-time low.” When the CCP becomes the voice of reason, you know the geopolitical ecosystem is utterly broken. SCMP

The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is now beyond catastrophic:

Over 62,614 Palestinians killed, the vast majority civilians, including thousands of children. More than 50,000 children are now reportedly killed or injured in the Gaza Strip according to unicef.
Widespread famine and disease due to Israel’s deliberate blockade of food, water, fuel, and medical aid.
- Civilian infrastructure reduced to rubble — schools, hospitals, bakeries, and refugee camps levelled in what Israel loosely labels as “precision strikes.”
Aid groups unable to function, with convoys halted or bombed, and even UN personnel killed while performing humanitarian work.
At least 225 journalists and media workers killed since October 2023, four more of them today (6th June 25), making this the deadliest conflict for journalists on record — surpassing even Iraq and Syria. The majority were Palestinian, and many were explicitly targeted, often while wearing press vests.
International journalists banned from entering Gaza since the beginning of the assault. Israel has completely barred foreign press access, meaning all reporting from inside the Strip depends on local Palestinian journalists — the very people being killed. This ban has been in place for over 7 months and is still enforced today. The Guardian

Meanwhile, Israel’s forces have been quietly joined by private military contractors, with zero oversight and no accountability mechanisms. Just what every volatile war-zone needs — anonymous men with guns and no paperwork. What could possibly go wrong?

“Let’s stop pretending a ceasefire ends violence. In Gaza, it just reschedules it — with intensity.”

The question, then, is simple:
Does a ceasefire protect Palestinian civilians — or just delay the next wave of more efficient, better coordinated devastation?

Because if past is prologue, we know exactly what happens next. Israel pauses, reloads, upgrades its tactics, and comes back harder. With new drones, new targets, and fewer international eyes. And now, with the use of private contractors, even fewer fingerprints.

As we move into the next section, we explore precisely that:
The strategic misuse of ceasefires, Israel’s documented pattern of returning with greater violence, and why the absence of international accountability could make this current pause the most dangerous one yet.

At this point, expecting a ceasefire in Gaza to lead to anything resembling actual peace is a bit like expecting a halftime break to stop the second half of a football match from being violent — especially when one team shows up after the interval with tanks, drones, and a grudge.

The term “ceasefire” implies a mutual pause in hostilities, ideally leading to negotiations and stability. In the context of Israel and Palestine, however, it’s come to resemble a strategic coffee break — not for diplomacy, mind you, but for re-calibrating missile trajectories and bomb targets.

Across the last 30 years, a pattern has emerged: Israel agrees to ceasefires and then — often within weeks, sometimes days — returns with more deadly force than before. Civilian deaths increase, infrastructure is razed anew, and international headlines briefly flutter before retreating to cover celebrity divorces and budget airline disasters. More recently, Israel hasn't even pretended to abide to them.

Let’s take a quick stroll down memory lane — or more accurately, the recurring nightmare.

A Brief History of Ceasefire Casualties — Hint: It’s Not Very Cease-y, and has been Barely Fair when Israel Kept Firing.

2025: In January, a U.S.-Qatar-Egypt brokered ceasefire was announced. Lovely. Promising. Doomed. Within six weeks, Israel had reportedly committed 962 violations — yes, nine hundred and sixty-two — involving aid blockades, surveillance drones, sniper fire, and yes, airstrikes. By 17 March, over 400 Palestinians were killed in a single night as Israel "responded" to provocations it largely engineered through its own violations. A ceasefire, then, in the same way a shark takes a breather before charging at a lifeboat.

2021: After 11 days of Israeli bombardment, another ceasefire. Brief applause. Then Israel resumed its airstrikes and West Bank raids. The ink hadn’t dried before the jets were back in the sky. Celebrity marriages have lasted longer.

2014: Operation Protective Edge ended with a ceasefire, but left over 2,200 Palestinians dead, the majority civilians. Sporadic post-ceasefire attacks followed, as did UN reports so damning they were quietly shelved like all the others.

2008–2009: A ceasefire in June 2008 degenerated into Operation Cast Lead in December, with over 1,400 Palestinians killed. Israel claimed Hamas violated the truce; Hamas claimed Israel did. Neutral observers? They mostly just counted the bodies and shrugged.

This isn’t conjecture or "he said, she bombed." These patterns are documented by independent observers including Truthout, Al Jazeera, Middle East Eye, and the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. The through-line is unmistakable: ceasefires often give Israel time to regroup, reload, and return with greater devastation — not less.

2025: The Most Dangerous Reset Yet.

The current situation is beyond bleak. More than 80% of Gaza’s population is displaced. Aid is intermittently blocked. Famine is not looming — it’s ongoing. And the international community is furiously tapping out strongly worded letters, which Israel files directly under “bin.”

If a new ceasefire fails — and judging by Israel’s record, there’s little doubt it will — the consequences will be worse than ever. Because now, the population is condensed into so-called “safe zones” that have, historically, proven anything but. The next round of bombardment won’t need to search for targets — they’re already neatly grouped, labelled, and desperate.

The Rise of Mercenary Warfare: Private Guns, Public Consequences:

What makes the current situation even more chilling is Israel’s increased use of private military contractors. According to multiple credible reports from European monitoring agencies and leaked diplomatic memos, Israel has outsourced parts of its ground operations to private firms, many of them ex-special forces from the U.S., UK, and South Africa.

These contractors are allegedly involved in urban clearance, sniper operations, and even “crowd control” near aid routes — which, given the death toll near food drop sites, seems like a euphemism for something darker. If a statement from Israel last week is to be believed, they had the use of Tanks too. Because someone used them to fire on people waiting to get food.

Why outsource? Several reasons:

Plausible deniability: When civilians are killed, you can blame the contractor and say, “They weren’t IDF.”
Expedited brutality: Private firms are less constrained by military codes and oversight.
International loopholes: Contractors can’t be prosecuted by the same mechanisms as official military units.

This is essentially military capitalism — killing on contract — and it adds yet another layer of horror to an already grotesque conflict. Ceasefires, in this light, don’t just buy Israel time to resupply; they allow for the on-boarding of new personnel with fewer rules and more firepower.

So… Should There Be a Ceasefire?

On paper, yes. Of course. Every day without bombs is a day more children might survive.

But let’s not delude ourselves: a ceasefire without enforcement, accountability, and genuine international commitment is just a longer fuse on a bigger bomb. History shows that when Israel has time to rest and retool, the eventual assault is more efficient, more deadly, and more politically justified — at least in the eyes of its allies.

In the current context — with the U.S. publicly expressing frustration but privately green-lighting arms sales, and international law being treated like a quaint suggestion — another ceasefire could very well be the worst thing to happen to Gaza at this point.

Unless, of course, it comes with teeth. Not polite diplomacy. Not “de-escalation frameworks.” But hard international pressure, trade consequences, and war crimes accountability — for both state actors and private contractors.

This situation is not what is was at the point of the last ceasefire, this isn’t a situation where we can say the cycle will continue, this time it could be the end of the cycle.

The previous cycle involved a ceasefire, regrouping, and mass murder. This time, it could be: regroup, kill everyone, blame Anonymous Mercenaries, and Shrug.

The Final Warning: Gaza’s Ceasefire Could Be the Prelude to Catastrophe:

At this point, the risk to Palestinian civilians is not just high — it is existential. With Gaza’s population forcibly compressed into a narrow strip of land, any illusion of safety is shattered. The Israeli military, bolstered by private contractors, has the capability to execute mass casualties swiftly. The presence of anonymous private military forces further exacerbates this threat, as their actions often evade accountability.

Hardline elements within the Israeli government have openly advocated for the complete removal of Palestinians from Gaza. This is not speculative; it is documented policy. The combination of ideological extremism and military might creates a scenario where the entire Gazan population could be at risk of annihilation.

History has shown that ceasefires, in this context, often serve as strategic pauses for Israel to regroup and intensify its military campaigns. Without robust international intervention, these ceasefires are more likely to lead to greater devastation rather than peace.

People keep talking about a ceasefire without reckoning with the most urgent and obvious question: what if Israel abuses it — again? The situation now is not just another flare-up; it is an end-of-days moment for Gaza’s civilian population. With over two million people kettled into a compressed warzone, the consequences of trusting another hollow truce could be apocalyptic. We cannot afford to gamble with civilian lives. Based on decades of historical precedent, the odds are not with the people of Gaza — they are with a state that has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to use lulls in fighting as rearmament windows. But worse, this time, the intent is openly declared. On 28 October 2023, Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the Israeli public, saying: “This is a struggle between the children of light and the children of darkness, between humanity and the law of the jungle.” Now, let’s just pause to absorb just how evil that is, before we then consider what his his National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, previously demanded that Gaza be “flattened,” and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has openly stated: “There are no innocents in Gaza.”

These are not idle threats. They are ambitions. And they are being acted upon with impunity.

What Can Be Done?

The international community must act decisively to prevent further atrocities. This includes:

Deploying Neutral Peacekeeping Forces: A multinational force, under the auspices of the United Nations, must to be deployed to Gaza to monitor ceasefires and protect civilians. Past missions in regions like Sierra Leone and East Timor have demonstrated the effectiveness of such interventions.

Ensuring Accountability for Private Military Contractors: International laws must be enforced to hold private military companies accountable for their actions in conflict zones. This includes transparent reporting and legal consequences for violations.

Applying Diplomatic and Economic Pressure: Countries must leverage diplomatic channels and economic sanctions to compel Israel to adhere to international laws and protect civilian lives.

Establishing Humanitarian Corridors: Safe passages must be created to allow the delivery of essential aid and the evacuation of vulnerable populations.

The United States' historical support for Israel complicates its role as a neutral mediator. They are clearly not neutral, they have a dog in this fight and it’s name is Israel. Therefore, other nations, particularly those with a track record of successful peacekeeping, must take the lead in these efforts.

In conclusion, the world stands at a critical juncture. Without immediate and decisive action, the risk isn’t that the cycle of violence in Gaza will continue, it’s that the entire Gazon population could be murdered where they stand. It is imperative that the international community moves beyond rhetoric and takes concrete steps to protect the lives of Palestinian civilians.

Want to take action? The most effective thing you can do right now is to write to your local political representative and register your stance. If you’re in the UK, go directly to: https://www.writetothem.com. In the US, try: https://www.govtrack.us for comprehensive contact details and bill tracking. In Austrailia the official Parliament website: https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Contacting_Senators_and_Members or OpenAustralia: A non-partisan platform that allows you to search for your representatives by postcode and provides information on their parliamentary activities: https://www.openaustralia.org.au/

Each of these sites makes it simple to find out who speaks for you – so you can speak to them... I'm pretty sure if you live somewhere else, your country will have something similar. Go find it!

Thank you for reading! If you liked this article, I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a moment to hit the Share button. And if you’d like to see more content like this, please take just a couple of seconds to subscribe below!

If you’re interested in supporting my work, donations on Ko-fi can be as little as the price of a coffee. I also have a Tip Jar Button below where you can tip whatever you like. For those looking to provide long-term support, there are annual subscriptions available through the Substack subscription page. Every contribution, no matter how small, is greatly appreciated! Otherwise, I’d still love a Sub & Share, which costs absolutely nothing!

The Algorithm Knows Best: How Social Media Built the World’s Most Efficient Echo Chamber

James Macleod

Feb 18

The Algorithm Knows Best: How Social Media Built the World’s Most Efficient Echo Chamber

The Internet Was Supposed to Bring Us Together. Oops.

Read full story